Notes from the past

Today, while cleaning up my room, I re-discovered a collection of old notebooks of mine. I have been carrying small black notebooks around for the past few years, and used them for pretty much anything. I kept at least some of them and today, I flipped through them again. It’s an awesome way to be remembered of things you have long forgotten; a form of inspiration from the past.

I have taken pictures of some pages I found particularly interesting, and I’ll post them with short explanations or stories here in the next few weeks. I assume that that’s not really of interest to other people but, well, I’ll do it anyway.

The picture above (dated June 2006) is very typical of how my life was structured then (and, in some parts, still is): On the left side, there are notes on the Spanish Inquisition from a class I’ve been taking at the time; the upper right side is a list of tasks mostly related to Polyparty, a big student party I was organizing, and on the lower right is some form of work structure for a company I had founded with some friends then (I’m pretty sure we never implemented the structure, and just from the notes, I don’t really remember what the idea of it was exactly).

Posted via email from Nico Luchsinger

After the trip

For a few days after a trip there's always the battle between the road and the work, and you just have to hope that the beauty of what you are making is worth trading away the beauty of moving, because that's pretty beautiful, too, and it's hard to know which is more worthy of time.

Jonathan Harris writes this in his daily project "Today". 

Posted via email from Nico Luchsinger

Leaning forward in time

Researchers at the University of Aberdeen found that when people were asked to engage in a bit of mental time travel, and to recall past events or imagine future ones, participants’ bodies subliminally acted out the metaphors embedded in how we commonly conceptualized the flow of time.

As they thought about years gone by, participants leaned slightly backward, while in fantasizing about the future, they listed to the fore. The deviations were not exactly Tower of Pisa leanings, amounting to some two or three millimeters’ shift one way or the other. Nevertheless, the directionality was clear and consistent.

Very interesting article from the New York Times relating to how we experience time and space. Thanks to Thierry Blancpain for pointing me to it.

Posted via email from Nico Luchsinger

Multiple selves

 

As we enter the new century, we can see yet another change. Kids do not have multiple memberships so much as multiple selves. They are many people bundled into one. And now we can't tell very much about them from the way they dress. Now  they belong to networks [...], and this is the new locus of the self. These kids are distributed across social worlds and cultural worlds. The days of a definining social group are gone. The days of fixed membership are gone. Indeed, the very idea of a generation may well be over. (emphasis mine)

Interesting quote from the book Chief Culture Officer I'm currently reading. Not sure I agree with all of it, but the notion that "networks are the new locus of the self" has something to it, I guess. Full review of the book to follow.

Posted via email from Nico Luchsinger

The three challenges for Europe

The Abduction of Europa, by Tizian (1562)

I attended a talk by british historian Timothy Garton Ash today on “Europe in a non-European world”. Garton Ash spoke at the University of Zurich, in the same place where, 54 years ago, Winston Churchill famously proclaimed ”Let Europe arise!” Today, given the incredible development of Europe and the European Union, even Churchill would be surprised, said Garton Ash. Yet Europe, he continued, is also in trouble; it faces three big challenges that it must tackle:

The first is the challenge of improving relations with “Islam” (by which Garton Ash mostly meant the Arab states). Turkey, he argued, must become a full member of the European Union; furthermore, it is in Europe’s own vital interest to build a real neighbourhood policy towards the Arab states and help them develop. Without this, Garton Ash warned, the pressure of mass immigration from these states could “tear our society apart”.

The second challenge is what Garton Ash calls the “Renaissance of Asia”. The power that shifted from Asia to Europe 500 years is shifting back to India and, most of all, China. Garton Ash compared the emerging superpowers with 19th-century European states that believe in their absolute sovereignty. Periods of power-shifting have always been periods of war, he warned, a danger that is aggravated because it is likely that China will endure an economic crisis in the near future. To avoid tensions, Garton Ash called for “massive constructive engagement”: European universities, he said, should take in as many Chinese students as they possibly can.

The third challenge, finally, is the global issues; first and foremost global warming. There is a need for collective action, Garton Ash said, but supply of it is still lagging behind. He called for a G-3 - a group consisting of China, the U.S. and the EU - to set a strategic global agenda.

The underlying question with all these challenges is, of course: Why did the European Union do so little until now to tackle them? Europe, concluded Garton Ash, lacks leadership, lacks proper institutions - but most of all, it lacks a coherent public opinion. In fact, the one thing that Europeans have in common is America. Everywhere in Europe, people know what is going on in American politics - much more so than what is going on in other European countries, or even other countries outside Europe. 

The European Union, said Garton Ash, is a victim of its own success. It could only be so successful because it was a vision, a telos - and now that it has been achieved, the problems start to show. Germany, for long a motor of European integration, has become “a second France” (which is to say just a normal European state), because it has lost one of its main reasons to drive forward the European project - unification.

Posted via email from Nico Luchsinger

Some quotes from DLD10


Image by dotdean on Flickr

I attended the DLD Conference in Munich earlier this week. It was my first time, and I'll certainly be back - from all the conferences I've seen so far, DLD is one of the best (my favourite remains LIFT in Geneva though). Here are some noteworthy quotes and thoughts from the conference:

"Whenever media changes, society changes." - Hubert Burda quoting Walter Benjamin.

"It's not about simplicity, but about subtlety." - Jonathan Harris on storytelling.

"Technological feasibility is not a problem anymore. Now, it's about policy." - Dave Morgan from Simulmedia

"The real dangers facing the development of the web in the future are complacency and mystification." - David Gelernter

"If the web is so good in bringing people together, then what the hell are we all doing here?" - David Gelernter again

"Don't listen to the consumer. Surprise the consumer." - some participant at the marketing panel whose name I didn't get.

"There is no web 3.0 yet. We're still in the middle of the web 2.0." - Reid Hoffman

I wrote about DLD in greater detail for my blog at NZZ (in German).

Posted via email from Nico Luchsinger

Das beste Studium der Welt - Redux

«History», Mosaik von Frederick Dielman. Bild von Wikimedia Commons.

Vor etwa einem Jahr habe ich eine Kolumne für das Historiker-Magazin der Universität Zürich, den Elfenbeintürmer, verfasst, in der ich versucht habe darzulegen, warum Geschichte das beste Studium der Welt sein soll. Als mich kürzlich jemand danach gefragt hat, ist mir aufgefallen, dass der Text nicht mehr länger online verfügbar ist. Und da sich mein Studium rasant dem Ende nähert, schien dies ein guter Moment zu sein, um die Kolumne hier nochmals einzufügen (hauptsächlich, damit ich sie selbst später wieder finde - man weiss ja nie, wann man sowas wieder braucht)

Das beste Studium der Welt

Nicht-Historiker haben manchmal einige Mühe, die Wahl eines Geschichtsstudenten zu verstehen. Einige erklären zwar noch etwas bemüht, Geschichte sei schon «interessant» und habe sie in der Schule auch immer fasziniert – doch wie man sich als ausgebildeter Historiker sein Leben finanzieren kann, bleibt für alle schwer vorstellbar.
Ist Geschichte tatsächlich eine brotlose Kunst und ihre Vertreter sich an obskuren Quellen delektierende Schöngeister, die im Haifischbecken der freien Marktwirtschaft gnadenlos in Stücke gerissen werden? Keineswegs. Denn die Wahrheit lautet ganz simpel: Geschichte ist das beste Studium der Welt.
Das hat nur wenig mit dem insbesondere von professoraler Seite zuweilen vorgebrachten Argument zu tun, aus der Geschichte lasse sich für die Gegenwart und die Zukunft lernen. Das ist zwar nicht per se falsch, aber für wegweisende zukünftige Entscheidungen sind historische Analysen kaum ausreichend. Zumal das historische Faktenwissen eines Geschichtsabsolventen normalerweise, sagen wir mal, fragmentarisch ist.
Der immense Vorteil eines Geschichtsstudiums liegt vielmehr im sich rapide ändernden Umgang mit Informationen. Vor noch nicht allzu langer Zeit waren Informationen eine knappe Ressource, und der Zugang zu ihnen folglich wertvoll. Mit der rasanten Entwicklung von Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien hat sich das aber radikal geändert. Informationen sind im Überfluss, überall und jederzeit für jedermann vorhanden. Den entscheidenden Vorteil verschafft sich nicht mehr, wer über Informationen verfügt, sondern wer relevante Informationen schnell identifizieren, analysieren und in einen Kontext setzen kann.
Dabei geht es um viel mehr als nur darum, Google richtig bedienen zu können. Zunehmend komplexe Problemstellungen lassen sich nicht mehr mit vorgefertigten Herangehensweisen lösen. Der Erfolg beruht stattdessen darauf, sich Wissen und Kontextinformationen in einem bestimmten Gebiet schnell anzueignen, um es dann anzuwenden – nur um im nächsten Augenblick dasselbe in einem völlig anderen Themengebiet zu tun. Die alte Prämisse vom life long learning wird immer wichtiger, und für Firmen und Organisationen wird die «konstante Innovation» zur Maxime. Und dafür braucht es neben Spezialisten eben auch smarte Generalisten, die sich schnell in neuen Bereichen zurecht finden.
Genau darin sind Historiker gut. Denn Geschichte ist keine Lehre von Fakten und Ereignissen, und auch nicht so sehr eine Lehre von Modellen, die bestimmte Prozesse erklären können. Geschichte ist, in vielerlei Hinsicht, die Wissenschaft vom Umgang mit Informationen. 
Natürlich trifft das auf viele andere geistes- und sozialwissenschaftliche Studiengänge auch zu. Aber schliesslich ist das hier ein Historiker-Magazin. Deshalb nochmals: Geschichte ist das beste Studium, das es gibt. Denn woran es den Historikern definitiv mangelt, ist Selbstvertrauen. Und ohne das wird auch der Rest der Welt nie verstehen können, zu was ein Geschichtsstudium taugt.

Posted via email from Nico Luchsinger

Political flash mobs

A Michael Jackson flash mob in Iasi, Romania, by epox on Flickr

A few months ago, I participated in an event about “Politics 2.0″ here in Switzerland. One of the input speakers was the head of the youth section of one the major Swiss party. His section had used a lot of social media tools to push their political agenda. They used them smartly and created good stuff that often went viral and made it to mainstream media. However, at one point in the discussion I suggested that what we were talking about wasn’t actually “Politics 2.0″, it was merely “political marketing 2.0″. It was the communications part that was being redone; but the old system of doing politics and creating policy remained unchanged. I went on to predict that the social web (or whatever you wanna call it) would change this too; and that the future would see a decline of classical political parties and the rise of “political flash mobs” - groups of people finding together online to push a specific issue.

Needless to say, the speaker didn’t agree with my prediction. He didn’t only state that this would never happen, he also said that it shouldn’t - because only political parties could secure the working of a democratic system. And granted, I’m not sure myself whether “political flash mobs” ever will (or should) replace political parties. But nevertheless, I have kept thinking about this idea because, actually, I think that we’re already seeing signs of this happening.

Of course, there’s the often-cited statistical evidence that less and less young people are willing to join a political party. Most of them probably really don’t care that much about politics, but there’s also others (including myself) who actually do care, but don’t find themselves represented by any of the available parties and their ideologies. Meanwhile, I think there’s also a quite fundamental shift in how philantropy is done (I’ll write about that in more detail some other time). After the devastating earthquake in Haiti last week, a lot of the donations were done through mobile phones; and organizations like Kiva, Betterplace or Kickstarter allow to “crowdfund” very specific projects (check out this post by my Sandbox team colleague Paul Gleger for more info on mobile banking and crowdfunding). The trend is two-fold: First, thanks to online technology, large groups of people with no apparent previous connection can be convinced to contribute or donate to the same cause; and thanks to online communication, accountability rises, and people are more and more inclined to contribute or donate not to organizations and what they stand for, but for specific projects or issues.

I’m convinced that we’ll see more similar developments in national politics too. That doesn’t mean that parties will cease to exist altogether, but maybe they have to become more open platforms that allow people to come together and work on specific issues. And they’ll have to accept that most of these people will never pledge allegiance to a party, but rather turn to whatever issue they think deserves their attention - regardless of the corner of the political spectrum it originated from. In a way, the idea of “political flash mobs” is the political equivalent of the idea of “social business design“, one of the six big topics we identified at Sandbox for the coming year (and beyond).

Posted via email from Nico Luchsinger

Product vs. business

I’ve been re-reading Steven B. Johnson’s excellent essay on the future of news from last March (thanks to Eric Kuhn for pointing me to it again). It makes many great points, but one stood out particularly for me:

[...] there are really two worst case scenarios that we’re concerned about right now, and it’s important to distinguish between them. There is panic that newspapers are going to disappear as businesses. And then there’s panic that crucial information is going to disappear with them, that we’re going to suffer as culture because newspapers will no long be able to afford to generate the information we’ve relied on for so many years.

I think this distinction is crucial. It’s probably true that newspapers as a stand-alone business will have it more difficult in the future (there will probably still be some that are profitable, but not many). But the newspaper as a product, either as part of a bundle of news products (newspapers, magazines, websites, TV shows, Twitter channels, Facebook pages, whatever), or cross-subsidized by, say, a lucrative business intelligence department, most likely has a future.

Posted via email from Nico Luchsinger

Feedback on the personal e-mail update

Two weeks ago, I sent out a personal e-mail update to roughly 200 contacts of mine. I thought that I’d share some of the feedback and learnings:

First, the background. I wrote the update (which was inspired by Ben Casnocha’s regular e-mail updates) because I felt that true value is only created if one manages to stay connected with people. I had the feeling that a lot of people I had met at one point had no idea what I had been up to - and I didn’t know what was going on in their lives.

Over the last two weeks, about 20 people, roughly 10 percent of the recipients, replied to my message. Some of them just said thank you, others replied in more detail and actually gave me an update about their lives. Most of the people who replied were contacts with whom I don’t interact on a regular basis - “weak ties“, if you will. I believe that the power of such an update lies exactly in being able to reconnect with these people, and learning what they are up to.

Most of the feedback about the e-mail was positive, although some said they would prefer just grabbing a beer at some point instead of receiving e-mail, and others told me that the automatic unsubscribe link in the e-mail was too “professional” for such a personal message. I agree with both; I will try to catch up with as many people as possible in person - and I’ll remove the unsubscribe link in my next update.

Speaking of which: Yes, there will be a next update. I have no idea when I’ll send it out or what it’ll say. After all, this is still very much an experiment.

Posted via email from Nico Luchsinger

The power of simplicity

Over the last years, I have tried many many task management tools, but I have never been really happy with anyone of them. About two years ago, I decided to stick with Remember The Milk, which seemed to have everything a task management service should have; from lists to tags to priorities to e-mailing in functions etc. RTM is a really powerful tool; and yet, I have to admit that I only used it from time to time. Every once in a while, I made an effort, and managed to actually manage my tasks with it for a couple of weeks, but soon, I gave up again.

I’m not blaming RTM (or any other task management software) for this; it just seems that I haven’t figured out a way to work with them yet. So I have recently decided to give a new tool a try: Teuxdeux, designed by blogger and designer Swissmiss (who recently attended one of our Sandbox dinners in NYC). And so far, I’m really happy with the tool - for one main reason: It is really simple. Dead simple.

There are no lists and no tags. You can’t add notes to tasks, or places, you can’t connect them with your e-mails, color them differently or sort them alphabetically. There is simply a list for each day, and a “someday” bucket. You can add tasks, rearrange them with drag and drop, mark them completed and delete them. That’s it.

And it turns out that probably that’s all it needs, at least for a big majority of people, including me. Our lives, while sometimes hectic, are simply not that complicated that they need very sophisticated software to manage it. A simple yet well-designed tool does the trick.

Now, having said that, there are still a few things I’d like to see added to TeuxDeux: Offline access (through Google Gears), and an iPhone application. But that’s all. Really. 

Posted via email from Nico Luchsinger

Reversed messages

Awesome palindrome video (via Swissmiss). According to a comment, it might be a rip-off of this video spot. Here’s another great palindrome.

Posted via web from Nico Luchsinger